Mental Health Liaison Literature Review
2 min read · Last updated 1 October 2026
Mental health liaison services are the teams and professionals responsible for providing mental health care within general hospital settings: assessing young people in distress, connecting them to appropriate follow-on care, and supporting other clinical staff who may have limited mental health expertise. Despite their importance, there has been relatively little research on what these services look like in practice, how well they meet young people's needs, and what better support could look like. This project, led by Miriam Avery at the Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, sets out to address that gap.
The Research
The project unfolds in three stages. A literature review first establishes what is already known about health outcomes and experiences for young people and families who encounter mental health liaison professionals, what is known about the experiences of staff providing these services, and what is understood about the impact of liaison on hospital-level outcomes including cost and staffing. The review is particularly important because it guides what is examined in the subsequent stages: questions not addressed in the existing literature become priorities for the fieldwork that follows.
After the review, a national survey of professionals across England will map what mental health liaison services currently look like in different hospital settings. Finally, detailed case studies at selected hospitals will provide richer qualitative data. observations of how services operate in practice, interviews with young people and their families, and interviews with clinical staff were designed to identify what works well and what could be improved. The project's overall aim is to produce actionable recommendations for ensuring that mental health liaison services genuinely meet the needs of young people in England.
My Involvement
I was involved in this project as a reviewer contributing to the literature review phase. This involved acting as a second reviewer on a sample of research papers identified by the literature search: reading papers, verifying the data extraction carried out by Miriam Avery (checking that relevant information had been accurately identified and recorded from each paper), and contributing to the thematic analysis, offering a young person's perspective on what patterns were emerging from the evidence and what those patterns might mean in terms of lived experience.